AI Governance for Florida Schools (2026–2027)
Florida charter, vocational, training, GED, CTE, and private schools are entering review cycles in which AI usage, curriculum integrity, and documentation controls are evaluated as an integrated framework.
Schools are not cited for using AI.
They are cited for failing to govern it.
1
Why This Matters to Owners
-
AI is already being used by staff and students—approved or not
-
Most schools cannot reconstruct how AI influenced instruction or assessment
-
Documentation gaps—not teaching quality—drive most findings
-
Florida policy direction is moving toward documented AI controls
Florida Senate -2026
by Senator Jones
Amending s. 1001.03, F.S.
2
Where Schools Are Most Exposed
-
No written AI governance or use boundaries
-
Unclear human instructional authority over AI-assisted work
-
Assessments that cannot be defended during review
-
Policies that exist but are not operationalized
-
No audit-ready evidence trail
Florida Senate -2026
by Senator Jones
Amending s. 1001.03, F.S.
3
What Regulators Expect to See
-
Documented AI governance and use policy
-
Clear human oversight and approval authority
-
Defined, approved instructional AI use cases
-
Disclosure expectations for staff and students
-
Evidence that can be reconstructed during audits
Florida Senate -2026
by Senator Jones
Amending s. 1001.03, F.S.
AI governance does not restrict innovation. It protects the institution by making AI use defensible, controlled, and review-ready.
Course for faculty members to learn how to implement human-governed, audit-ready AI systems in educational environments.
Includes: governance fundamentals, policy alignment, oversight controls, and real-world case examples.
Enroll Free | No Credit Card Required
